Search This Blog

Thursday, April 23, 2009

CJA Turns Heat On Mills

Posted: The Chronicle Wednesday, April 22, 2009

By Charles Takyi-Boadu
The Committee for Join Action (CJA) has turned the heat on President John Evans Atta Mills, and his National Democratic Congress (NDC) administration, by kicking against the recent fuel price increases.
The pressure group is contending that the tendency of always passing the cost onto Ghanaians, whenever the price of crude oil shoots up on the world market, rather ends up aggravating the suffering of the average Ghanaian.
At a press conference in Accra yesterday, the Spokesman for the group, Bernard Mornah, said "we are totally dissatisfied with the recent increases in fuel prices, and believe that a continuation of that policy would not be in the interest of the masses."
Mornah, who was flanked by some key members of the CJA, including Dr. David Percy, Felix Kwakye and Kwesi Adu, therefore charged the government to find an alternative, but more creative way, to address the issue of fuel price increases, stressing, "We cannot, as a nation, continue to purchase crude oil at spot market prices."
They threatened to advice themselves, if the government did not meet their demands for a reduction in fuel prices, and subsequent reduction in transport fares.
It has suggested to the government to consider the option of hedging, to alleviate the plight of Ghanaians, especially the poor and vulnerable in society.
The CJA stressed that further reduction in taxes on petroleum products could be done, if alternative sources of revenue are pursued.
In this light, the group has asked the government to make full disclosure of its indebtedness to the Tema Oil Refinery (TOR), urging it to thoroughly investigate the TOR debt recovery levy.
Pursuant to its objective of fighting economic hardships confronting the vast majority of Ghanaians, the CJA says it expects the NDC government to, as a matter of urgency, put in place pragmatic measures aimed at arresting the spiralling cost of living in the country, emphasising, "the conventional approach that Ghana has adopted over the years towards addressing our economic underdevelopment, has proved to be unreliable."
They have thus stressed the urgent need for Ghana, as a country, to undertake a complete overhaul of its economic paradigm.
Further, Mornah said it was the expectation of the CJA that the water crisis, that has bedevilled the people of Ghana for years on end, would be swiftly addressed by the Mills administration, saying, "not only should the phenomenon of carrying gallons and trekking long distances in search of water be brought to an end, but also clean, portable water should be made an affordable commodity for the generality of Ghanaians."
The pressure group also called on the government to review all agreements with foreign business concerns that have taken over the provision of water, but have proven unequal to the task.
It also urged the government to discontinue the policy of disposing strategic national assets any time the nation was in some financial difficulty, because the practice has not yielded many dividends to the nation, expressing its opposition to the surrender of Ghana Telecom to Vodafone.
"Although the surrender already took place under the NPP administration, we expect the government to review it with the aim of reclaiming the country's strategic assets and interests that were sold down the drain to Vodafone," they emphasised.
Though President Mills has indicated his preparedness to cut out, what he describes as the 'ostentatious and profligate' expenditure of former President Kufuor and his New Patriotic Party (NPP) administration, Mr. Mornah was optimistic the commitment on the part of the incumbent President would be carried through, and not become a nine-day wonder.
"Furthermore, the culture of entitlements that has become so ingrained in the mindset of our politicians and public servants, leading to their taking home of fantastic retirement packages to the detriment of the national economy, must be done away with," he said, noting, "it is heartwarming to note therefore that the President has taken steps to ensure that the unacceptable recommendations of the Chinery-Hesse Committee are reviewed, in spite of the protestations of some powerful interest groups."
Dr. David Persy, on his part, said the CJA would advice itself it the government did not give due recognition to the issues they have raised.
Conspicuously absent at the meeting were Messrs. Kwesi Pratt, Ato Ahwoi and Madam Ama Benyiwa Doe, who are all leading members of the group.

AFAG Pounces On Mumuni Again

Posted: The Chronicle Wednesday, April 22, 2009

By Charles Takyi-Boadu
The Alliance for Accountable Governance (AFAG), a pressure group, has alleged that the Foreign Minister, Alhaji Mohammed Mumuni, has ignored the tenets of international diplomacy, by terminating an agreement with an organisation which works for the promotion and protection of human rights, and the creation of a progressive human rights jurisprudence in Africa, without regard to the mandatory provisions of the said agreement.
Several phone calls made by this reporter, including a text message he sent to Alhaji Mumuni to get his side of the story, went unanswered.
At a press conference in Accra, the Spokesman for the group, Kwabena Bomfeh, said on the April 14, 2009, upon the instructions of Alhaji Muhammed Mumuni, the Acting Director of the Legal and Consular Bureau was purported to have terminated a headquarters agreement between the Government of Ghana and Africa Legal Aid.
According to the group, the headquarters agreement recognised the pre-eminent role of Africa Legal Aid, and its mission as an international organisation challenging impunity and lack of accountability for perpetrators of human rights violations, and affirmed the need for Africa Legal Aid to fearlessly discharge its functions, and execute strategies effectively, in an environment like Ghana's.
The Government of Ghana was said to have on the May 16, 2005, executed a headquarters agreement, by which Africa Legal Aid located its headquarters in Ghana, and the government of Ghana conferred certain rights, immunities and privileges on them.
The specific rights, immunities and privileges accorded to the organisation by the Government, as per the agreement, related to the general diplomatic immunities accorded the nation's diplomatic partners, and some international non-governmental organizations engaged in lofty activities like the advancement and protection of human rights.
It was an express provision of the agreement that any disputes between the parties, that is, the Government of Ghana and Africa Legal Aid, shall be settled by arbitration, in accordance with the Arbitration Act, 1961 (ACT 38).
Further, the agreement stipulated that either party to the agreement could terminate same, only upon the provision of six (6) months notice to the other.
However, AFAG noted that "in blatant disregard for these mandatory provisions of the agreement, and without providing any reason whatsoever, Alhaji Muhammad Mumuni, on the 14th day of April, 2009, ordered the immediate termination of the headquarters agreement by the Government of Ghana."
According to the group, this happened at a time when no dispute had occurred between the Government of Ghana and Africa Legal Aid to warrant the termination of the agreement, stressing that "there had not been the recourse to arbitration proceedings, as directed by the provisions of the agreement."
Further, Kabila, who was flanked by other members of AFAG, including Accra-based legal practitioner Abeiku Dickson, Sammy Awuku and Arnold Boateng, said Alhaji Mumuni ignored the requirement of the agreement of a six (6) months notice in writing to Africa Legal Aid before the Government of Ghana could terminate the agreement.
The group noted that no reason was assigned by Alhaji Mumuni, for the withdrawal of the rights, immunities and privileges conferred on the international human rights organisation by this headquarters agreement.
It is however not clear whether the Foreign Minister was not impressed by the human rights work of the organisation.
AFAG thus believes "certainly, the action of Alhaji Muhammad Mumuni demonstrates a disdain for the promotion of human rights," saying, "to the extent that no reason was advanced by Alhaji Mumuni for authorising the termination of the headquarters agreement of the Government of Ghana with the Africa Legal Aid, it is fair to say that perhaps the Honourable Minister for Foreign Affairs deemed the human rights activities of that organisation offensive."
This, they said, was evident in the fact that his conduct was also in palpable violation of due process and the rule of law, stressing "it is hugely appalling and deplorable of a person occupying the position of the Chief Diplomat of the nation."
To them, this was also evident in the fact that he had shown utter disregard for the tenets of diplomacy, and could therefore not be seen to be parading as the nation's Chief Diplomat.
Ultimately, AFAG says its concern is the effect of the Minister's action on the nation's diplomatic relations, and relationship with international human rights bodies and agencies, saying "Alhaji Mumuni's action, no doubt, exhibits contempt for international organisations engaged in the advancement and protection of universal human rights and the eradication of impunity."

Arthur Kennedy: Mills is weak

Posted: The Chronicle Thursday, April 23, 2009


By Charles Takyi-Boadu
A leading member of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Dr. Arthur Kobina Kennedy, believes all is not well with President John Evans Atta Mills.
After observing the activities and operations of the Mills administration for the past three months, he noted that the President looks quite weak, tentative, and not completely in charge of his own government.
He made these comments in an interview with The Chronicle, as a follow up to his opinion piece titled ‘The implosion of the NDC’.
Dr. Kennedy said this may be an intended or unintended side effect of the frustrations the President has been going through from both members of his party, and at the hands of former President Jerry John Rawlings.
According to him, he had credible information from NDC insiders, to the effect that behind the scenes, members of particular factions barely speak to members of other factions created in the party, identifying them as the Rawlings, Mills and Mahama factions.
Though the government is barely in place, he noted that there was a scramble to succeed President Mills, by those who have calculated that he cannot, or will not ran again.
This, according to him, is what compelled the President to come out to state that there was only one President in the country, and that “when the people of Ghana voted, they voted for only one President. They did not vote for President number one and President number two.”
Given his party affiliation, most people would expect Arthur Kennedy to be happy that the NDC is having difficulties, considering the fact that it is a cardinal rule in politics that when one’s political opponent or enemy is in the process of destroying himself, he should not interfere.
The rationale for this rule is that when a party’s opponents are suffering from self-inflicted wounds, they stand to benefit. However, Arthur Kennedy emphasised, “we should all be concerned about the NDC, because their stability and cohesion are tied to that of our country.
When the NDC and hence its government implodes, it may take the country down with it. While I want the NPP to win the next election, there must be democracy for there to be a democratic transfer of power.”
To him, this is why the welfare of the NDC, as party and government, should be of concern to every Ghanaian, between now and January 2013.
“We have seen this before. Between September 1979 and December, 1981, the ruling People’s National Party (PNP) was engulfed by factionalism and infighting. Then, as now, members of the party attacked one another in public.
The President was openly defied in public and in Parliament. Even one of his budgets was rejected,” he recalled with nostalgic memory.
As the government at the time staggered from one crisis to the next, he emphasised, people lost confidence in it and in democracy, which led to the 31st December, 1981 coup, in which Ghanaians woke up to the sound of martial music, and the announcement of ‘so-called’ liberators who had come to rescue them from the PNP.
Dr Kennedy thus quoted Santayana who once said, “Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat its tragedies”. “I am not suggesting that those involved have any sinister motive. It is just that eventually, such disparate actions, coalesce and take on a life of their own, beyond anyone’s control, and lead to untoward consequences for the governing party and the country,” he stated.
With all candour, he said, “I am not making this foray into NDC’s divisions, because all is completely well on the NPP front.
But, while the nation can afford a divided NPP for a while, it cannot afford a divided NDC. Our national interest requires, for now, a united NDC,” asking, “how can we restore amity and comity to the NDC?”
First, he said, it was important to heed the reminder of President Mills that Ghanaians voted for only one President, saying “it is crucial that all of us do our very best to support the President as he discharges the mandate given to him by the people of Ghana.”
To him, this means that all institutions and individuals must give the President their support, and resist the usurpation of powers and functions, which is reserved only for the President.
He also had cause to advice the NDC to find ways of hearing dissenting voices from their party in private, thereby urging former President Rawlings to show more support for the man who he plucked from political obscurity, and worked so hard to make President.
“It is regrettable that after working so hard to get President Mills elected, the former President is undermining President Mills.
He must find more appropriate channels to voice his concerns. As one who has held the office of President before, President Rawlings is in a unique position to appreciate the pressures of the Presidency, and hence to show more understanding,” he stressed.
That notwithstanding, Arthur Kennedy stressed on the need for the President to also show more respect to his party, since, according to him, “he did not win elections as an independent candidate. He won on the ticket of his party.
Therefore, he must involve his party and its structures in making decisions in which they have legitimate interests and must have input.”